There are several important limitations to this systematic review. First, the meta-analysis included observational studies and RCTs, and two retrospective studies accounted for the majority of the patients included in the systematic review.
, This led to a significant risk of confounding. We opted to focus on RCT data to mitigate the risk of bias. However, the RCT data were limited by small sample sizes, which may not have had sufficient power to detect clinically significant differences. Second, the included studies evaluated a wide range of ages (birth to 18 years), though only two studies stratified outcomes based on age groups. Authors also included studies evaluating both sepsis and septic shock, which vary in the degree of illness severity. Focusing on studies with a greater composition of septic shock patients or including only studies with septic shock may yield a more significant result in favor of balanced crystalloids. Third, there was significant variability in the included studies concerning the etiology of sepsis, the outcomes evaluated, the definition of AKI, and follow-up periods, contributing to heterogeneity. There was also limited reporting of outcomes based on overall fluid balance.
Based on the available data from this systematic review, the use of balanced crystalloids in pediatric sepsis and septic shock likely reduces the need for RRT. However, due to the high risk of bias resulting from including observational and retrospective studies, the validity of these results are questionable. There is likely no difference in mortality, and the small sample sizes do not provide sufficient power to detect clinically significant differences.
Of note, a 2025 meta-analysis including 5 RCTs (n = 992) evaluated balanced crystalloids and normal saline in children 1 month to 18 years. They found balanced crystalloids were associated with a lower risk of AKI (RR: 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.8), RRT (RR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.76), and hyperchloremia (RR: 0.74, 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.87). However, they did not find a difference in mortality, and the overall risk of bias was low and unclear in most domains, which led to a low certainty level rating for these findings. As of the publication of this manuscript, both the adult and pediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines recommend the use of balanced crystalloids over normal saline.
,
In summary, while balanced crystalloids may offer some benefits over normal saline in pediatric patients with sepsis and septic shock, the evidence comes from a small sample of RCTs as well as observational studies and requires confirmation through larger studies. Future research should also assess other patient-centered outcomes such as mortality to ensure the robustness of these benefits. As such, we have assigned a Yellow (unclear benefit; more data needed) NNT color recommendation to this intervention.
The original manuscript was published in
Academic Emergency Medicine as part of the partnership between TheNNT.com and AEM.